I am Not Really a Lumberjack and I also’m Not Really OK; Angry Gambler Strikes Back

I am Not Really a Lumberjack and I also’m Not Really OK; Angry Gambler Strikes Back

Maybe Not everyone carrying an axe is just a lumberjack

Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Not likely, since most lumberjacks don’t generally carry their axes around with them on evenings out. But two stories have popped up in the media showing that non-lumberjacks don’t stick to these necessarily rules.

Axing For Trouble

The first of those two tales of violence occurred in a village club in Fontaniva, Italy, the place where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact their revenge on some slots that are unsuspecting after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in 2 weeks.

The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and movie streaming sites, where audiences can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.

After blowing off steam, the device hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but maybe not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits. Either this was an indication of victory, or a show of friendship towards these particular machines. Whenever working with crazy, interpretations are anyone’s guess.

The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a nearby bar.

‘ He comes in here all the time to relax and play the machines,’ said who owns the bar, who chose probably wisely- to keep nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a complete lot of money. He is a laborer and only works any now and then.’ Apparently, this will be one worker whom keeps his equipment that is own handy.

‘He’s normally a very peaceful man. He just strolled in really calmly by having an axe and smashed all the devices. There had been a few customers by them during the time plus they had been terrified,’ he included.

The man was sentenced for six months for criminal damage and possession of an offensive weapon as a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst. But jail overcrowding got him off with absolutely nothing more than a slap on the hand.

But Wait, There’s More…

The 2nd of these two tales is a bit more terrifying, since the axe was wielded perhaps not at the slots, but at a member of the staff at a wagering store in the Welsh capital of Cardiff.

Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ event left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes betting store in Cardiff ‘in circumstances of shock.’

Before raiding the till and making down with some cash, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over their head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ worker with injury or worse if he did not comply.

A authorities spokesperson investigating the crime said that two men, both wearing ski masks, entered the bookie’s store at 9:30 pm in the night of the incident. One calmly stood guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the associate because of the tree-chopping weapon.

The frightened shop assistant then handed over what police referred to as a ‘quantity of money,’ therefore the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven with a suspect that is third.

Police are now appealing to the public that is local information that could help apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did perhaps not wait calmly for arresting officers to show up regarding the scene.

Whose Casino Is It Anyhow? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out

The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan

Whilst every and each of the three licensing battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has already established its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight within the casino slated to be found in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston candidate that is mayoral threatening a lawsuit over one such proposal that would put a casino into the neighboring town of Everett.

Voting Rights

The legal option is related to the theory that neighboring communities is affected by casino projects, but won’t have to be able to vote on whether those casinos should really be opened in the place that is first. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, an applicant for mayor of Boston, has been one of the handful of applicants whom have recommended that most of Boston should have the ability to vote on a casino that would be positioned in East Boston, for instance.

It is unfair to the surrounding communities when it comes to the proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote on. Should the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would file suit to stop the Everett casino based regarding the impact it might have on many Boston neighborhoods.

‘The Wynn proposal was voted…on in just one community,’ Conley stated within a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will keep its traffic, economic, and burdens that are social receive none of the proposed benefits.’

In line with the state laws that produced the opportunity for three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get a vote on whether or not allowing the projects to be built. However, casino developers are needed to negotiate payment, with arbitration needed in the event that casinos and governments that are localn’t arrived royal vegas casino real money at a resolution on their own.

Conley has proposed having a path that is not actually outlined in the 2011 casino law with regards to the East Boston casino proposal, one that is being produced by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He would have the entire city of Boston vote on whether to accept the proposal, while nevertheless granting East Boston veto power throughout the vote that is entire. The casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be approved in other words.

Yay or Nay?

A Boston Globe survey found that six of the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in favor of it, with just two coming out against it (with Conley and one other candidate not answering the question) while Conley has not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal. Meanwhile, four of ten applicants supported allowing the city that is entire vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to just East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents discovered that 44% were and only the casino, while 37% opposed it.

Regardless if voters back these proposals, just one will ultimately be chosen by hawaii as the future site of a casino in the Boston area. Along side the Everett and East Boston casino plans, additionally there is a competing proposal from Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.

Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO

Chuka Umunna, taken to task for accepting donation

Chuka Umunna, cited as the rising star of the united kingdom’s Labour Party who has publicly announced their discontent towards the bookmaking industry got their own hand caught in the sports book cookie jar after accepting a contribution of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from the retired premier sports betting company CEO.

Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation

As a wagering shop critic whom has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna however accepted the large contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing members of the Conservative Party to call out the shadow business secretary, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double standards.

Since Gala Coral Group is certainly one of the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for the number that is large of outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the united states- it just didn’t really read well.

Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign targeted at reducing the spread of bookies and betting stores in the area roads of his south London Streatham constituency, and went so far as to promise ‘new powers to get a handle on the number of betting shops.’

‘we understand there is certainly concern that is huge some streets in our area are steadily filling up with wagering shops and pay day loan businesses that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a report to local voters earlier this year.

‘ Can anyone really credibly ever believe anything Chuka Umunna states?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says something in public and does another behind closed doors. His hypocrisy appears to be limitless.’ And that’s very uncommon for the politician.

Spared on a Technicality

Nonetheless, fighting back the corner regarding the Labour Party MP, a spokesperson for Umunna reported that ‘this contribution was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a capacity that is personal and was accepted in accordance aided by the guidelines and properly declared.’

Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the workplace of Chuka Umunna in his capability as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, as well as for staffing,’ so it will officially pass as legitimate.

Even though Goulden is no further a relative head of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he invested as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group ensures that he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.

Whether this is a donation that is completely innocent not, and whether or not the Conservative Party that are looking to ruin the promotion of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after taking such a difficult stance against the spread of the industry in their local constituency.

‘ The only thing we know he really believes is that the capital is filled with ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ stated Bob Neill.

Umunna, who is considered to be a future Labour Party leader, has already experienced his share that is fair of as earlier this year their office was accused of modifying his Wikipedia page showing comparisons between himself and Barack Obama.